Photo Illustration by Sarah Rogers/The Daily Beast/Getty
The other day, the sting operation dubbed Operation Varsity Blues exposed a long list of well-heeled and well-known parents who rigged the college-admissions process, to some extent if you are paying proctors and ringers to take or correct tests for their kids. Not even after news for the scheme broke, critics rushed to indicate that celebrity parents like Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman did need to break n’t what the law states to game the system.
For the ultra-rich, big contributions might get their name on a science building and their offspring an area at a top-tier school—an option California Gov. Gavin Newsom recently called essay writing “legal bribery.” Even the moderately wealthy can grease the admissions process with extensive SAT tutoring or, more problematically, college application essay editing.
Within the admissions process, there’s a top premium in the personal statement, a 500-word essay submitted through the normal Application, about some foible or lesson, which is designed to give readers a far better feeling of the student than, say, a standardized test score. More than one university and advising blog rank the essay one of the “most important” aspects of the process; one consultant writing in The New York Times described it as “the purest part for the application.”
But while test scores are completed by the student alone—barring bribed proctors, that is—any number of individuals can alter an essay before submission, opening it as much as exploitation and less-than-pure tactics at the hands of helicopter parents or college-prep that is expensive who cater to the 1 percent.
In interviews aided by the Daily Beast, eight college application tutors shed light in the economy of editing, altering, and, on occasion, outright rewriting personal statements. The essay editors, who agreed to speak from the condition of anonymity since many still operate in their field, painted the portrait of a market rife with ethical hazards, in which the relative line between helping and cheating can be tough to draw.
The staff who spoke to The Daily Beast often worked for companies with similar approaches to essay writing. For some, tutors would early skype with students on when you look at the application process to brainstorm ideas. (“I would personally say there have been plenty of cases of hammering kids with potential ideas,” one tutor said. “Like, ‘That’s a idea that is terrible an essay, why don’t you try this instead?’”) Then, the student would write a draft, and bounce back edits due to their tutor, that would grade it in accordance with a rubric that is standardized which included categories like spelling, sentence structure, style, or whether or not it was “bullshit-free.”
Most made between $30 and $100 per hour, or just around $1,000 for helping a student through the entire application process, on occasion working on as many as 18 essays at a time for various schools. Two tutors who worked for the company that is same they got an added bonus if clients were accepted at their target universities.
One consultant, a 22-year-old Harvard graduate, told The Daily Beast that, during his senior year in college, he began being employed as an essay editor for an organization that hires Ivy Leaguers to tutor applicants on a range of subjects. As he took the work in 2017, the company was still young and fairly informal september. Managers would send him essays via email, therefore the tutor would revise and return them, with ranging from a 24-hour and turnaround that is two-week. But from the beginning, the consultant explained, his managers were “pretty explicit” that the job entailed less editing than rewriting.
“When it’s done, it requires to be great enough for the student to go to that school, whether that means lying, making things up on behalf for the student, or basically just changing anything so that it will be acceptable,” he told The Daily Beast. “I’ve edited anywhere from 200 to 225 essays. So, probably like 150 students total. I would say about 50 percent were entirely rewritten.”
The tutor said, a student submitted an essay on hip-hop, which named his three or four favorite rappers, but lacked a clear narrative in one particularly egregious instance. The tutor said he rewrote the essay to tell the story of this student moving to America, struggling to get in touch with an American stepfamily, but eventually finding an association through rap. “I rewrote the essay so that it said. you realize, he found that through his stepbrother he could connect through rap music and having a stepbrother teach him about rap music, and I talked relating to this loving-relation thing. I don’t know if that was true. He just said he liked rap music.”
In the long run, the tutor said, his company shifted its work model. Instead of sending him random, anonymous essays, the managers started initially to assign him students to oversee throughout the college application cycle that is entire. “They thought it looked better,” the tutor said. “So if I have some student, ‘Abby Whatever,’ I would personally write all 18 of her essays such that it would look like it had been all one voice. I experienced this past year 40 students into the fall, and I wrote all their essays for the most popular App and anything else.”
Don’t assume all consultant was as explicit concerning the editing world’s moral ambiguities. One administrator emphasized that his company’s policies were firmly anti-cheating. He conceded, however, that the rules were not always followed: “Bottom line is: it will require more time for an employee to stay with a student and help them figure things out on their own, than it can to just take action. We had problems in the past with individuals cutting corners. We’ve also had problems in the past with students asking for corners to be cut.”
Another consultant who struggled to obtain the company that is same later became the assistant director of U.S. operations told The Daily Beast that while rewriting had not been overtly encouraged, it absolutely was also not strictly prohibited.
“The precise terms were: I happened to be getting paid a lump sum payment in return for helping this student with this specific Common App essay and supplement essays at a couple of universities. I happened to be given a rubric of qualities when it comes to essay, and I was told that the essay had to score a certain point at that rubric,” he said. “It was never clear that anything legal was at our way, we had been just told to produce essays—we were told therefore we told tutors—to make the essays meet a certain quality standard and, you know, we didn’t ask way too many questions regarding who wrote what.”
A number of the tutors told The Daily Beast that their clients were often international students, seeking suggestions about simple tips to break right into the American university system. A few of the foreign students, four of the eight tutors told The Daily Beast, ranged within their English ability and required significant rewriting. One consultant, a freelancer who stumbled into tutoring within the fall of 2017 after a classmate needed anyone to take over his clients, recounted the storyline of a female applicant with little-to-no English skills.
“Her parents had me come in and look at all her college essays. The form they certainly were delivered to me in was essentially unreadable. I mean there have been the bare workings of a narrative here—even the grasp on English is tenuous,” he said. “I genuinely believe that, you realize, having the ability to read and write in English could be types of a prerequisite for an university that is american. However these parents really don’t care about that at all. They’re likely to pay whoever to help make the essays seem like whatever to have their kids into school.”
The tutor continued to advise this client, doing “numerous, numerous edits with this girl’s essay” until she was later accepted at Columbia University. Although not long for help with her English courses after she matriculated, the tutor said she reached back out to him. “She doesn’t know how to write essays, and she’s struggling in class,” he told The Daily Beast. “i actually do the help that I can, but I say into the parents, ‘You know, you failed to prepare her for this. She is put by you in this position’. Because obviously, the abilities required to be at Columbia—she doesn’t have those skills.”
The Daily Beast reached off to numerous college planning and tutoring programs while the National Association for College Admissions Counseling, but none responded to requests to go over their policies on editing versus rewriting.
The American Association of College Registrars and Admissions Officers also declined comment, and universities that are top as Harvard, Yale, Princeton, the University of Pennsylvania, Cornell, Dartmouth, and Brown did not respond or declined comment on the way they protect well from essays being compiled by counselors or tutors. Stanford said in a statement which they “have no specific policy with regard to the essay percentage of the application form.”